Statistical Methods in Medical Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moye, L. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moye, L. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on October 9, 2007
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2007, doi:10.1177/0962280207080641
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Article

Disciplined analyses in clinical trials: the dark heart of the matter

Lemuel A Moye*

Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Clinical research analyses must balance the desire to ‘learn all that is learnable’ from the database with the observation that sample-based data commonly lead to conclusions that are perfectly correct for the sample, but wholly incorrect for the population from which the data were based.

Investigators who defend exploratory analyses as reliable, misuse important tools that have taken over three hundred years to develop. Statistical estimators in clinical trials function appropriately when they incorporate random data that is gathered in response to a fixed research question. Their prediction ability degrades rapidly when the selection of the research question is itself random, that is, left to the data. Operating like blind guides, these estimators mislead the medical community about what it would see in the population, based on sample observations. The result is a wavering research focus, leaping from one provocative but misleading finding to the next on the powerful waves of sampling error. Therefore, a primary purpose of the prospective design is to fix the research questions prospectively, thereby anchoring the analysis plan.

Prospective statements of the research questions and rejection of tempting databased changes to the protocol preserve the best estimates of effect sizes, standard errors, confidence intervals and p-values. Embracing these principles promotes the prosecution of a successful research program, that is, the construction and protection of a research environment that permits an objective assessment of the therapy or exposure being studied. If there is any fixed star in the research constellation, it is that sample-based research must be hypothesis-driven and concordantly executed to have real meaning for both the scientific community and the patient populations that we serve.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?