SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghidey, W.
Right arrow Articles by Verbeke, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghidey, W.
Right arrow Articles by Verbeke, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

A comparison of methods for estimating the random effects distribution of a linear mixedmodel

Wendimagegn Ghidey1*, Emmanuel Lesaffre2, and Geert Verbeke3

1 Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
2 Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands and Biostatistical Center, Catholic University Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
3 Biostatistical Center, Catholic University Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

This article reviews various recently suggested approaches to estimate the random effects distribution in a linear mixed model, i.e. (1) the smoothing by roughening approach of Shenand Louis,1 (2) the semi-non-parametric approach of Zhang and Davidian,2 (3) the heterogeneity model of Verbeke and Lesaffre3 and (4) a flexible approach of Ghidey et al.4 These four approaches are compared via an extensive simulation study. We conclude that for the considered cases, the approach of Ghidey et al.4 often shows to have the smallest integrated mean squared error for estimating the random effects distribution. An analysis of a longitudinal dental data set illustrates the performance of the methods in a practical example.

First published on June 18, 2008
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2008, doi:10.1177/0962280208091686


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement