This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Donner, A. Articles by Villar, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Donner, A. Articles by Villar, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials

University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, donner{at}biostats.uwo.ca

Gilda Piaggio

UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/WORLD BANK Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

José Villar

UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/WORLD BANK Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Cluster randomization trials have become a very attractive research strategy, particularly for the evaluation of health service interventions. The need to conduct meta-analyses of such trials is also becoming more common. However, as with cluster randomization trials in general, such analyses raise special methodologic challenges. In this paper, we discuss and illustrate several statistical approaches that might be applied to a meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials, each of which has a binary endpoint. Statistical methods for constructing inferences for a summary intervention odds ratio include those based on Mantel-Haenszel procedures, the ratio estimator approach, Woolf procedures and generalized estimating equations using robust variance estimation. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed in the context of an example.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 10, No. 5, 325-338 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/096228020101000502


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. A. Darlington and A. Donner Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes Clinical Trials, October 1, 2007; 4(5): 491 - 498. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. R White and J. Thomas Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis Clinical Trials, April 1, 2005; 2(2): 141 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Laopaiboon Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 515 - 530. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Donner, G. Piaggio, and J. Villar Meta-Analyses of Cluster Randomization Trials: Power Considerations Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2003; 26(3): 340 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]