This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lall, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lall, R Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments

Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

M J Campbell

Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

S J Walters

University of Sheffield, Sheffield Health Economics Group, Sheffield, UK

K Morgan

Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK

MRC CFAS Co-operative

There has been increasing emphasis in medical research on the design and analysis of quality of life scales. Many quality of life scales are ordinal and statistical methods such as ordinal regression models have been reviewed on a number of occasions. However, when such models are applied, the way the data have been generated is often overlooked. In this paper we illustrate the use of ordinal regression models, in particular the proportional odds model, the partial proportional odds model and the stereotype model in the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). The partial proportional odds and the stereotype models are often under-utilized, perhaps due to the lack of available software. However, in this paper, analysis based on these models has been carried out using the popular statistical software package SAS and macros devised in SAS. Furthermore, bootstrapping techniques have been applied to obtain valid estimates of the standard errors of the parameters in the stereotype model. Strikingly different results were obtained using the different ordinal regression models. We conclude that the way the data have been generated is particularly important for the analysis of quality of life assessments. Different methods of generating scores yield data with different properties. It is now possible to fit a variety of ordinal regression models and so select the appropriate one that correctly models the data.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 49-67 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0962280202sm271ra


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Gorman Koch, F. Khandwala, and E. H. Blackstone Health-Related Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2008; 12(3): 203 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A L. Gould Bayesian analysis of multicentre trial outcomes Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 249 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]