SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by London, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kadane, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by London, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kadane, J. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Parkinson's Disease
*Patient Rights
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Placebos that harm: sham surgery controls in clinical trials

Alex John London

Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, USA, ajlondon{at}andrew.cmu.edu

Joseph B. Kadane

Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, USA

Recent debates over the use of sham surgery as a control for studies of fetal tissue transplantation for Parkinson’s disease have focused primarily on rival interpretations of the US federal regulations governing human-subjects research. Using the core ethical and methodological considerations that underwrite the equipoise requirement, we find strong prima facie reasons against using sham surgery as a control in studies of cellular-based therapies for Parkinson’s disease and more broadly in clinical research. Additionally, we believe that these reasons can be generalized to apply to the use of other placebo controls that carry significant risks of positive harms in and of themselves. As a result, our arguments are centrally relevant to the emerging drive to subject therapies with a surgical component to the same rigorous standards of evaluation as those governing the approval of new pharmaceuticals.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 11, No. 5, 413-427 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0962280202sm300ra


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
O. Rascol
Assessing the risk of a necessary harm: Placebo surgery in Parkinson disease
Neurology, October 11, 2005; 65(7): 982 - 983.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
R L Albin
Sham surgery controls are mitigated trolleys
J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 149 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
F. G Miller and T. J Kaptchuk
Sham procedures and the ethics of clinical trials
J R Soc Med, December 1, 2004; 97(12): 576 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. Levine, R. Faden, C. Grady, D. Hammerschmidt, L. Eckenwiler, J. Sugarman, and on behalf of the Consortium to Examine Clinical Re
"Special Scrutiny": A Targeted Form of Research Protocol Review
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2004; 140(3): 220 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement