Statistical Methods in Medical Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gould, A L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gould, A L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, 249-280 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0962280205sm400oa

Bayesian analysis of multicentre trial outcomes

A Lawrence Gould

Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA, larry-gould{at}merck.com

Bayesian methods provide flexibility in the analysis of data from multicentre trials that would be difficult to achieve by other means. This paper illustrates some useful applications of Bayesian methods to the analysis of multicentre trials, with emphasis on insights that would be difficult to obtain using conventional frequentist methods. Two trials provide data for illustration: a large multicentre trial comparing two doses of a drug with placebo with respect to an essentially continuous measurement for which the original analysis revealed a significant treatment by centre effect, and a large multicentre trial with intraclass correlation induced by a categorical outcome of up to four episodes of heartburn reported by individual patients. The data from both trials had been analysed previously using conventional frequentist methods. Both sets of data were reanalysed using Bayesian and empirical Bayesian methods; all of the analyses provided the same conclusions for the key questions regarding treatment differences. The Bayesian methods provided some insights useful for model checking and also provided a way to explore some important quantitative aspects about the magnitude of treatment effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?