This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blance, A. Articles by Gilthorpe, M. S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blance, A. Articles by Gilthorpe, M. S Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A multilevel modelling solution to mathematical coupling

Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK and Biostatistics Unit, Centre of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Yu-Kang Tu

Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK and Biostatistics Unit, Centre of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Mark S Gilthorpe

Biostatistics Unit, Centre of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, m.s.gilthorpe{at}leeds.ac.uk

Owing to mathematical coupling, statistical analyses relating change to baseline values using correlation or regression are erroneous, where the statistical procedure of testing the null hypothesis becomes invalid. Alternatives, such as Oldham’s method and the variance ratio test, have been advocated, although these are limited in the presence of measurement errors with non-constant variance. Furthermore, such methods prohibit the consideration of additional covariates (e.g., treatment group within trials) or confounders (e.g., age and gender). This study illustrates the more sophisticated approach of multilevel modelling (MLM) which overcomes these limitations and provides a comprehensive solution to the analysis of change with respect to baseline values. Although mathematical coupling is widespread throughout applied research, one particular area where several studies have suggested a strong relationship between baseline disease severity and treatment effect is guided tissue regeneration (GTR) within dental research. For illustration, we use GTR studies where the original data were found to be available in the literature for reanalysis. We contrast the results from an MLM approach and Oldham’s method with the standard (incorrect) approach that suffers from mathematical coupling. MLM provides a robust solution when relating change to baseline and is capable of simultaneously dealing with complex error structures and additional covariates and/or potential confounders.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 14, No. 6, 553-565 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0962280205sm418oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?