SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiwari, R. C
Right arrow Articles by Zou, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiwari, R. C
Right arrow Articles by Zou, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Efficient interval estimation for age-adjusted cancer rates

Ram C Tiwari

National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

Limin X Clegg

Office of Healthcare Inspections, OIG, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA, lin_clegg{at}va.gov

Zhaohui Zou

Information Management Services, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA

The age-adjusted cancer rates are defined as the weighted average of the age-specific cancer rates, where the weights are positive, known, and normalized so that their sum is 1. Fay and Feuer developed a confidence interval for a single age-adjusted rate based on the gamma approximation. Fay used the gamma approximations to construct an F interval for the ratio of two age-adjusted rates. Modifications of the gamma and F intervals are proposed and a simulation study is carried out to show that these modified gamma and modified F intervals are more efficient than the gamma and F intervals, respectively, in the sense that the proposed intervals have empirical coverage probabilities less than or equal to their counterparts, and that they also retain the nominal level. The normal and beta confidence intervals for a single age-adjusted rate are also provided, but they are shown to be slightly liberal. Finally, for comparing two correlated age-adjusted rates, the confidence intervals for the difference and for the ratio of the two age-adjusted rates are derived incorporating the correlation between the two rates. The proposed gamma and F intervals and the normal intervals for the correlated age-adjusted rates are recommended to be implemented in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, 547-569 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0962280206070621


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. S. Pinheiro, R. L. Sherman, E. J. Trapido, L. E. Fleming, Y. Huang, O. Gomez-Marin, and D. Lee
Cancer Incidence in First Generation U.S. Hispanics: Cubans, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and New Latinos
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2009; 18(8): 2162 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Zhu, S. S. Devesa, H. Wu, S. H. Zahm, I. Jatoi, W. F. Anderson, G. E. Peoples, L. G. Maxwell, E. Granger, J. F. Potter, et al.
Cancer Incidence in the U.S. Military Population: Comparison with Rates from the SEER Program
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2009; 18(6): 1740 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. R. Eheman, K. M. Shaw, A. B. Ryerson, J. W. Miller, U. A. Ajani, and M. C. White
The Changing Incidence of In situ and Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Carcinomas: United States, 1999-2004
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2009; 18(6): 1763 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. Miller, J. B. King, A. B. Ryerson, C. R. Eheman, and M. C. White
Mammography Use from 2000 to 2006: State-Level Trends with Corresponding Breast Cancer Incidence Rates
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 352 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement