SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Model-based estimation of the attributable risk in case-control and cohort studies

Christopher Cox

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, MD, USA, ccox{at}jhsph.edu

In a comprehensive review, Benichou recently discussed adjusted estimators of the attributable risk (AR). Among these are model-based estimates, where adjustment for confounding factors is based on a regression model. Different model-based approaches have been developed for case-control and cohort studies. The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed review and illustration of model-based methods for both types of sampling. For case-control studies, we show that two previously proposed approaches for the common case of a logistic regression model are in fact identical. This allows a unified approach to the estimation of the adjusted AR, which also accommodates stratified sampling. For cohort studies, a loglinear model is proposed for the case where cross-sectional sampling allows estimation of the prevalence of exposure; the approach can also be used for stratified sampling when the prevalence is known or can be estimated. For both designs, the standard error of the adjusted AR is estimated using the delta method. Estimation of the generalized AR is also discussed for both types of sampling. Examples show that for even fairly complex models, the computations are practical using standard statistical software. The bootstrap provides an easily implemented alternative to the delta method for the computation of standard errors.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, 611-625 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0962280206071930


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, R. Walker, D. L. Miglioretti, A. Desai, R. Ballard-Barbash, D. S. M. Buist, and for the National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Breast
Obesity, Mammography Use and Accuracy, and Advanced Breast Cancer Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 3, 2008; 100(23): 1724 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement