This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Buuren, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Buuren, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification

TNO Quality of Life, Leiden, The Netherlands and University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, stef.vanbuuren{at}tno.nl

The goal of multiple imputation is to provide valid inferences for statistical estimates from incomplete data. To achieve that goal, imputed values should preserve the structure in the data, as well as the uncertainty about this structure, and include any knowledge about the process that generated the missing data. Two approaches for imputing multivariate data exist: joint modeling (JM) and fully conditional specification (FCS). JM is based on parametric statistical theory, and leads to imputation procedures whose statistical properties are known. JM is theoretically sound, but the joint model may lack flexibility needed to represent typical data features, potentially leading to bias. FCS is a semi-parametric and flexible alternative that specifies the multivariate model by a series of conditional models, one for each incomplete variable. FCS provides tremendous flexibility and is easy to apply, but its statistical properties are difficult to establish. Simulation work shows that FCS behaves very well in the cases studied. The present paper reviews and compares the approaches. JM and FCS were applied to pubertal development data of 3801 Dutch girls that had missing data on menarche (two categories), breast development (five categories) and pubic hair development (six stages). Imputations for these data were created under two models: a multivariate normal model with rounding and a conditionally specified discrete model. The JM approach introduced biases in the reference curves, whereas FCS did not. The paper concludes that FCS is a useful and easily applied flexible alternative to JM when no convenient and realistic joint distribution can be specified.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 219-242 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0962280206074463


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. J. Lee and J. B. Carlin Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Fully Conditional Specification Versus Multivariate Normal Imputation Am. J. Epidemiol., January 27, 2010; (2010): kwp425v1 - kwp425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hayward, H. M. Krumholz, D. M. Zulman, J. W. Timbie, and S. Vijan Optimizing Statin Treatment for Primary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, January 19, 2010; 152(2): 69 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. He Missing Data Analysis Using Multiple Imputation: Getting to the Heart of the Matter Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, January 1, 2010; 3(1): 98 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Goldstein, J. Carpenter, M. G Kenward, and K. A Levin Multilevel models with multivariate mixed response types Statistical Modeling, October 1, 2009; 9(3): 173 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A Wagstaff, S. Kranz, and O. Harel A preliminary study of active compared with passive imputation of missing body mass index values among non-Hispanic white youths Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 1025 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. B. Bruce, P. Preechawat, N. J. Newman, M. J. Lynn, and V. Biousse Racial differences in idiopathic intracranial hypertension Neurology, March 11, 2008; 70(11): 861 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]