SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandoz, M O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandoz, M O.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Clinical Trials
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The logic and role of meta-analysis in clinical research

M Oakes Sandoz

Clinical Development Centre, Frimley

The term meta-analysis refers to the quantitative combination of data from independent trials. Where the result of such combination is a descriptive summary of the weight of the available evidence, the exercise is of undoubted value. Attempts to apply inferential methods, however, are subject to considerable methodolo gical and logical difficulties. The selection and quality of the trials included, population bias, and the specification of the population to which inference may properly be made are problems to which no satisfactory solutions have been proposed. Insightful quantitative description ought not to differ materially from inferential conclusions; where discrepancies exist the inferential techniques should be regarded with extreme caution.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 147-160 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029300200203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement