This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thompson, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB CHOLESTEROL Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Controversies in meta-analysis: the case of the trials of serum cholesterol reduction

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London

There has recently been disagreement in the literature on the results and interpretation of meta-analyses of the trials of serum cholesterol reduction, both in terms of the quantification of the effect on ischaemic heart disease and as regards the evidence of any adverse effect on other causes of death. This paper describes statistical aspects of a recent meta-analysis of these trials, and draws some more general conclusions about the methods used in meta-analysis. Tests of an overall null hypothesis are shown to have a basis clearly distinct from the more extensive assumptions needed to provide an overall estimate of effect. The fixed effect approach to estimation relies on the implausible assumption of homogeneity of treatment effects across the trials, and is therefore likely to yield confidence intervals which are too narrow and conclusions which are too dogmatic. However the conventional random effects method relies on its own set of unrealistic assumptions, and cannot be regarded as a robust solution to the problem of statistical heterogeneity. The random effects method is more usefully regarded as a type of sensitivity analysis in which the weights allocated to each study in estimating the overall effect are modified. However, rather than using a statistical model for the 'unexplained' heterogeneity, greater insight and scientific understanding of the results of a set of trials may be obtained by a careful exploration of potential sources of heterogeneity. In the context of the cholesterol trials, the heterogeneity according to the extent and duration of cholesterol reduction are of prime concern and are investigated using logistic regression. It is concluded that the long-term benefits of serum cholesterol reduction on the risk of heart disease have been seriously underestimated in some previous meta-analyses, while the evidence for adverse effects on other causes of death have been misleadingly exaggerated.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 173-192 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029300200205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Crouse III, R. P. Byington, H. M. Hoen, and C. D. Furberg Reductase Inhibitor Monotherapy and Stroke Prevention Arch Intern Med, June 23, 1997; 157(12): 1305 - 1310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. C. Keyserling, A. S. Ammerman, C. E. Davis, M. C. Mok, J. Garrett, and R. Simpson Jr A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Physician-Directed Treatment Program for Low-Income Patients With High Blood Cholesterol: The Southeast Cholesterol Project Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1997; 6(2): 135 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Cappelleri, J. P. A. loannidis, C. H. Schmid, S. D. de Ferranti, M. Aubert, T. C. Chalmers, and J. Lau Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials: How Do Their Results Compare? JAMA, October 23, 1996; 276(16): 1332 - 1338. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. T. Jeng, J. R. Scott, and L. F. Burmeister A Comparison of Meta-analytic Results Using Literature vs Individual Patient Data: Paternal Cell Immunization for Recurrent Miscarriage JAMA, September 13, 1995; 274(10): 830 - 836. [Abstract] [PDF]