SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wacholder, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wacholder, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Design issues in case-control studies

Sholom Wacholder

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

The most difficult and most important considerations in planning the protocol of a case-control study are ascertainment of cases, selection of controls and the quality of the exposure measurement. Plans to ensure careful field work are equally important; without attention to data collection, the protocol will be meaningless. In most case-control studies, the measurement problem is magnified because one cannot implement the collection of exposure information at the beginning of follow-up, and instead must rely on interviews, existing records or extrapolation into the past. Consideration of a case-control study as an efficient way to study a cohort helps to resolve some design issues.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, 293-309 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029500400403
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
R. Ionescu-Ittu, A. J Marelli, A. S Mackie, and L. Pilote
Prevalence of severe congenital heart disease after folic acid fortification of grain products: time trend analysis in Quebec, Canada
BMJ, May 12, 2009; 338(may12_2): b1673 - b1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
W. Lee, J. Bindman, T. Ford, N. Glozier, P. Moran, R. Stewart, and M. Hotopf
Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: Literature survey
The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 190(3): 204 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. L. Gluud
Bias in Clinical Intervention Research
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2006; 163(6): 493 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. Zhou, G. Liu, S. W. Thurston, L. L. Xu, D. P. Miller, J. C. Wain, T. J. Lynch, L. Su, and D. C. Christiani
Genetic Polymorphisms in N-acetyltransferase-2 and Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase, Cumulative Cigarette Smoking, and Lung Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
B. Langholz, N. Rothman, S. Wacholder, and D. C. Thomas
Cohort Studies for Characterizing Measured Genes
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, December 1, 1999; 1999(26): 39 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Advertisement