|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Lung cancer and passive smoking
A K Hackshaw
Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
The evidence from epidemiological studies, studies of biochemical markers of exposure and toxicological studies, confirm that there is a causal association between the risk of lung cancer and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Nonsmokers can inhale and metabolize carcinogens in tobacco smoke and other markers of environmental tobacco smoke inhalation (nicotine and cotinine) are raised in nonsmokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. In epidemiological studies of women who are lifelong nonsmokers, there is a statistically significant excess risk of lung cancer (24%, 95% confidence interval 13-36%) from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke from the spouse and this increases with the number of cigarettes smoked and duration of marriage. Misclassification bias (women who smoke but claim to be lifelong nonsmokers) and dietary confounding are unlikely to explain the association; after adjustment for both, the risk of lung cancer from environmental tobacco smoke exposure was still statistically significant. In any event, their effects on the risk of lung cancer in the epidemiological studies are balanced out by allowing for background exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (that is, other than from the spouse) in the reference group; the excess risk after allowing for all three is an estimated 26% (95% confidence interval 7-47%), similar to the unadjusted figure of 24%. In Britain, about one in every six nonsmokers are exposed to tobacco smoke from smokers in the home. Passive smoking is an avoidable cause of mortality and morbidity. Prevention strategies to reduce the amount of cigarette smoking in public places should be part of public health policy.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 7, No. 2,
119-136 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029800700203

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J G Ayres, S Semple, L MacCalman, S Dempsey, S Hilton, J F Hurley, B G Miller, A Naji, and M Petticrew
Bar workers' health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland
Occup. Environ. Med.,
May 1, 2009;
66(5):
339 - 346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E Yano
Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions
Tob. Control,
August 1, 2005;
14(4):
227 - 235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Martey, S. J. Pollock, C. K. Turner, K. M. A. O'Reilly, C. J. Baglole, R. P. Phipps, and P. J. Sime
Cigarette smoke induces cyclooxygenase-2 and microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase in human lung fibroblasts: implications for lung inflammation and cancer
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
November 1, 2004;
287(5):
L981 - L991.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Nelson
The miseries of passive smoiong
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
February 1, 2001;
20(2):
61 - 83.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Husgafvel-Pursiainen, P. Boffetta, A. Kannio, F. Nyberg, G. Pershagen, A. Mukeria, V. Constantinescu, C. Fortes, and S. Benhamou
p53 Mutations and Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in a Multicenter Study on Lung Cancer
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2000;
60(11):
2906 - 2911.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|