SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, P. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, P. N
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Lung Cancer
*Secondhand Smoke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Difficulties in assessing the relationship between passive smoking and lung cancer

Peter N Lee

PN Lee Statistics and Computing, Sutton, Surrey, UK

Since 1981, numerous epidemiological studies have investigated the relationship between passive smoking and lung cancer in nonsmokers. The overall evidence, predominantly relating to women, indicates a weak association with the husband's smoking and many reviewers have concluded that this demonstrates a causal effect of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Interpreting weak associations is notoriously difficult, however, and this paper reviews problems specific to the ETS-lung cancer relationship. After describing how to select relevant studies and appropriate data, the methods for combining evidence together (`meta-analysis') are discussed, and the need to investigate sources of heterogeneity is emphasized. Separate consideration is given to various forms of bias that may affect overall relative risk estimates, including misclassification of active smoking status, confounding, systematic case-control differences, recall bias, diagnostic bias and publication bias. Sections on dose-response, multiple ETS exposure sources and other issues follow. The problems are illustrated from the available literature. It is shown there is no significant association of lung cancer with workplace, childhood or social ETS exposure or with smoking by the wife. Though statistically significant, the association with husband's smoking is weak and heterogeneous and varies widely according to various study characteristics. The association is markedly weakened by the adjustment for smoking misclassification bias and is likely to be affected by confounding and other sources of bias. While the precise extent of all the biases remains unclear, it seems impossible to conclude with any certainty that ETS causes lung cancer.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 137-163 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029800700204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
X.-R. Wang, Y.-L. Chiu, H. Qiu, J. S. K. Au, and I. T.-S. Yu
The roles of smoking and cooking emissions in lung cancer risk among Chinese women in Hong Kong
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 746 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. A. Tse, I. T.-s. Yu, J. S. K. Au, K. S. Yu, K. P. Kwok, H. Qiu, and T.-w. Wong
Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Among Chinese Nonsmoking Males: Might Adenocarcinoma Be the Culprit?
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2009; 169(5): 533 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J. A Francis, A. K Shea, and J. M Samet
Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses
Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv68 - iv76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. T.S. Yu, Y.-l. Chiu, J. S.K. Au, T.-w. Wong, and J.-l. Tang
Dose-Response Relationship between Cooking Fumes Exposures and Lung Cancer among Chinese Nonsmoking Women.
Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4961 - 4967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. N. Lee, J. S. Fry, and B. Forey
Revisiting the Association between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: V. Overall Conclusions
Indoor and Built Environment, March 1, 2002; 11(2): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
J. S. Fry and P. N. Lee
Revisiting the Association between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: I. The Dose-Response Relationship with Amount and Duration of Smoking by the Husband
Indoor and Built Environment, November 1, 2000; 9(6): 303 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. S. Litwin and K. A. McGuigan
Accuracy of Recall in Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment Among Men Treated for Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 1999; 17(9): 2882 - 2882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. N. Lee
Revisiting: Involuntary Smoking and Lung Cancer: a Case-Control Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 7, 1999; 91(7): 647a - 648a.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement