This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zhou, X.-H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhou, X.-H. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis, USA, azhou{at}iupui.edu

Standard methods for assessing the accuracy of diagnostic tests require determination of true disease status for each study patient. In practice, some study patients might not have verified disease status. If the decision to verify a patient is influenced by the test result, analysis using only verified cases might lead to biased results, commonly known as verification bias. This paper reviews recent developments in bias-correction methods for studies on the accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 337-353 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029800700403


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Fletcher, S. M. Kymes, M. Gould, N. Alazraki, R. E. Coleman, V. J. Lowe, C. Marn, G. Segall, L. A. Thet, K. Lee, et al. A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the Characterization of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Delgado-Rodriguez and J Llorca Bias J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2004; 58(8): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tonelli, G. S. Jhangri, D. J. Hirsch, J. Marryatt, P. Mossop, C. Wile, and K. K. Jindal Best Threshold for Diagnosis of Stenosis or Thrombosis within Six Months of Access Flow Measurement in Arteriovenous Fistulae J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2003; 14(12): 3264 - 3269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Obuchowski Special Topics III: Bias Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 617 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Rosen, T. S. Mehta, R. Bromberg, S. L. Kelly, and D. Levine Remote Sonographic Interpretation Using a Laser Printer Network: System Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy in Actual Clinical Practice Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2001; 176(4): 855 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Debourdeau, J. Gligorov, C. Zammit, J. Dalmau, H. S. Gultekin, and J. B. Posner A Serologic Marker of Paraneoplastic Limbic and Brain-Stem Encephalitis in Patients with Testicular Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., November 4, 1999; 341(19): 1475 - 1476. [Full Text]

				D. E Shapiro The interpretation of diagnostic tests Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 113 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L Hui and X. H Zhou Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 1998; 7(4): 354 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]