This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shapiro, D. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shapiro, D. E Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The interpretation of diagnostic tests

Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, shapiro{at}sdac.harvard.edu

Laboratory diagnostic tests are central in the practice of modern medicine. Common uses include screening a specific population for evidence of disease and confirming or ruling out a tentative diagnosis in an individual patient. The interpretation of a diagnostic test result depends on both the ability of the test to distinguish diseased from nondiseased subjects and the particular characteristics of the patient and setting in which the test is being used. This article reviews statistical methodology for assessing laboratory diagnostic test accuracy and interpreting individual test results, with an emphasis on diagnostic tests that yield a continuous measurement. The article begins with a summary of basic concepts and terminology, then briefly discusses study design and reviews methods for assessing the accuracy of a single diagnostic test, comparing the accuracy of two or more diagnostic tests and interpreting individual test results.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 113-134 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800203


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Nuevo, V. Lehtinen, P. M. Reyna-Liberato, and J. L. Ayuso-Mateos Usefulness of the Beck Depression Inventory as a screening method for depression among the general population of Finland Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Gengsheng Qin and L. Hotilovac Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 207 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M.G. Leeflang, K. G.M. Moons, J. B. Reitsma, and A. H. Zwinderman Bias in Sensitivity and Specificity Caused by Data-Driven Selection of Optimal Cutoff Values: Mechanisms, Magnitude, and Solutions Clin. Chem., April 1, 2008; 54(4): 729 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Chauca, J.-C. Palomino, and H. Guerra Evaluation of rifampicin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a mycobacteriophage D29-based assay J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2007; 56(3): 360 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Zou, A. J. O'Malley, and L. Mauri Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests and Predictive Models Circulation, February 6, 2007; 115(5): 654 - 657. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Mumford, E. F. Schisterman, A. Vexler, and A. Liu Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis Biostat., October 1, 2006; 7(4): 585 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Medeiros, P. A. Sample, L. M. Zangwill, J. M. Liebmann, C. A. Girkin, and R. N. Weinreb A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2520 - 2527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Holmes, D. E. Purdy, D.-Y. Chao, A. J. Noga, and G.-J. J. Chang Comparative Analysis of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Using Virus-Like Particles or Virus-Infected Mouse Brain Antigens To Detect IgM Antibody in Sera from Patients with Evident Flaviviral Infections J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2005; 43(7): 3227 - 3236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Lim, A. Ali, Z. Khalpey, H. Ashrafian, C. Jackson, Z. Ali, T. Chamageorgakis, F. Wells, J. Pepper, A. DeSouza, et al. A validated simple model to predict coexistent coronary disease in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2005; 129(6): 1318 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Purdy, A. J. Noga, and G.-J. J. Chang Noninfectious Recombinant Antigen for Detection of St. Louis Encephalitis Virus-Specific Antibodies in Serum by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2004; 42(10): 4709 - 4717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Beydon, I. Pin, R. Matran, M. Chaussain, M. Boule, B. Alain, M. Bellet, F. Amsallem, C. Alberti, A. Denjean, et al. Pulmonary Function Tests in Preschool Children with Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2003; 168(6): 640 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Baker The Central Role of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves in Evaluating Tests for the Early Detection of Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2003; 95(7): 511 - 515. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-N. Qian, X. Guo, B. Cao, E. J. Kort, C.-C. Lee, J. Chen, L.-M. Wang, W.-Y. Mai, H.-Q. Min, M.-H. Hong, et al. Met Protein Expression Level Correlates with Survival in Patients with Late-stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(2): 589 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]