|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research
M J Campbell
Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, m.j.campbell{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Cluster randomized trials are increasingly common in general practice (family medicine). This paper will consider the design and analysis of such trials and emphasize the similarities and differences with trials in education, heath promotion and public health. Issues discussed are the estimation and range of values of the intra-cluster correlation coefficient found in general practice, and the associated sample size problems. There are problems with widely varying numbers of subjects per cluster, which leads to planning and analysis difficulties. Ethical issues in these trials, and considerations such as the principle of intention to treat are also considered. An example of the type of analysis available for a continuous outcome variable is given, and the available software is summarized briefly.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 9, No. 2,
81-94 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/096228020000900202

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. van Breukelen, M. J. Candel, and M. P. Berger
Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes for variance component estimation in cluster randomized and multicentre trials
Statistical Methods in Medical Research,
August 1, 2008;
17(4):
439 - 458.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M Turner, S. G Thompson, and D. J Spiegelhalter
Prior distributions for the intracluster correlation coefficient, based on multiple previous estimates, and their application in cluster randomized trials
Clinical Trials,
April 1, 2005;
2(2):
108 - 118.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J Campbell
Extending CONSORT to include cluster trials
BMJ,
March 20, 2004;
328(7441):
654 - 655.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Donner and N. Klar
Pitfalls of and Controversies in Cluster Randomization Trials
Am J Public Health,
March 1, 2004;
94(3):
416 - 422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Cummings and T D Koepsell
Statistical and design issues in studies of groups
Inj. Prev.,
March 1, 2002;
8(1):
6 - 7.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|