|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Multiple imputation: current perspectives
Michael G Kenward
Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK, mike.kenward{at}lshtm.ac.uk
James Carpenter
Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
This paper provides an overview of multiple imputation and current perspectives on its use in medical research. We begin with a brief review of the problem of handling missing data in general and place multiple imputation in this context, emphasizing its relevance for longitudinal clinical trials and observational studies with missing covariates. We outline how multiple imputation proceeds in practice and then sketch its rationale. We explore the problem of obtaining proper imputations in some detail and distinguish two main classes of approach, methods based on fully multivariate models, and those that iterate conditional univariate models. We show how the use of so-called uncongenial imputation models are particularly valuable for sensitivity analyses and also for certain analyses in clinical trial settings. We also touch upon other forms of sensitivity analysis that use multiple imputation. Finally, we give some open questions that the increasing use of multiple imputation has thrown up, which we believe are useful directions for future research.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, Vol. 16, No. 3,
199-218 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0962280206075304

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Holman, A. J. Farmer, M. J. Davies, J. C. Levy, J. L. Darbyshire, J. F. Keenan, S. K. Paul, and the 4-T Study Group
Three-Year Efficacy of Complex Insulin Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 29, 2009;
361(18):
1736 - 1747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Nur, L. G Shack, B. Rachet, J. R Carpenter, and M. P Coleman
Modelling relative survival in the presence of incomplete data: a tutorial
Int. J. Epidemiol.,
October 25, 2009;
(2009)
dyp309v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Goldstein, J. Carpenter, M. G Kenward, and K. A Levin
Multilevel models with multivariate mixed response types
Statistical Modeling,
October 1, 2009;
9(3):
173 - 197.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A Wagstaff, S. Kranz, and O. Harel
A preliminary study of active compared with passive imputation of missing body mass index values among non-Hispanic white youths
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
April 1, 2009;
89(4):
1025 - 1030.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hernandez, F Sullivan, P Donnan, I Swan, L Vale, and for the BELLS Trial Group
Economic evaluation of early administration of prednisolone and/or aciclovir for the treatment of Bell's palsy
Fam. Pract.,
April 1, 2009;
26(2):
137 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Thiebaut and S. Walker
When it is better to estimate a slope with only one point
QJM,
October 1, 2008;
101(10):
821 - 824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Holman, K. I. Thorne, A. J. Farmer, M. J. Davies, J. F. Keenan, S. Paul, J. C. Levy, and the 4-T Study Group
Addition of Biphasic, Prandial, or Basal Insulin to Oral Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 25, 2007;
357(17):
1716 - 1730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|